|
Post by darkchampion96 on Jun 24, 2006 11:16:23 GMT -5
Which is better?
160 SAC ESFS or 179a SM 140a SAC
I'm thinking they're tied, but still, I'm not the wisest DC guy lol..
|
|
|
Post by Srfred on Jun 24, 2006 11:31:37 GMT -5
i say the 160 only because the 179a SM is rusted.
|
|
|
Post by icecreamman on Jun 24, 2006 12:01:26 GMT -5
i would almost always rather trade up as long as its not overpaying.that seems fairly even but im not sure how much people value masas lately
|
|
|
Post by darkchampion96 on Jun 24, 2006 15:09:14 GMT -5
Okay.. have decided.. sonotdef is leading
|
|
|
Post by jackthebear on Jun 24, 2006 19:53:03 GMT -5
i would rather have the 160 myself where is this for sale? if you're trading the 160 I'd bid more than the bid you listed
|
|
|
Post by super geek on Jun 24, 2006 20:16:42 GMT -5
yea i would go with the 160 cause of rust on the other one dude
|
|
|
Post by darkchampion96 on Jun 24, 2006 21:42:34 GMT -5
I bought the 160a SAC ESFSUR with 9 dwarf axes Just telling everyone.. holding a g-way with it on the TP
|
|
|
Post by jackthebear on Jun 24, 2006 22:11:26 GMT -5
cool deal and nice job on the giveaway
|
|